fomapan 400 vs hp5

I have shot Foma 100 to get some lovely portraits and have used it for general purpose shooting outdoors on a bright sunny day with great results. HP5+ is the better film. But when its off, its pretty meh for me. I have gotten some nice shots out of it.

Is HP5 really $20 better than Fomapan? Required fields are marked *. I dont think I have as direct an analogy with Fomapan 400, its more of its own thing. Quite frankly, I deeply dislike BW films that are too sensitive to red. Are you metering correctly? I have enjoyed shooting Fomapan 100, but based in what I have read, I have never tried the 400 speed. The images more often than not remind of me Tri-X at box speed that prevailing grey-tone is distinct.

Anyway, I am bulkloading my 35mm rolls so at the end it can be very very cheap indeed, and this is something I enjoy when I go shooting or I want to experiment.

I think people looking for that aesthetic and willing to be less cavalier with their metering would be happy with the lower cost of Kentmere. This allows me to worry less about temperature, and I sort of just let things sort themselves out in the tank with as little agitation as necessary. However I really wanted to get better negatives. Every time I use it, I wonder why I dont use it more often. On screen, your frames look great. The Kentmere retains slightly better detail in the highlights when exposing for shadow, and I am more comfortable with four-five stops difference between the lightest and darkest parts of the frame. For starters it is a 200 ISO film not a 400 film. Ilford HP5 Plus Black and White Negative Film (35mm Roll Film, 36 Exposures) You Pay: $8.95. Let me know in the comments below if youve ever tried this film, and if so, whatd you think? Ya I actually think I got my best results by cranking the temp up on the DF96 to 90. Fp4 is a great film, little grain with punchy contrast and a good amount of sharpness. I realized in short order that I had to meet a certain quality level for every thing I was doing, and started referring to the rolling machine as the patented film scratcher. For example, I have shot Kentmere 400 pushed to 1600 or 3200 when photographing indoor sporting events. I have used the HP5+ a good bit and am satisfied with it, but I see that Fomapan is much cheaper. Seems to work best for me. It is a true 400 ISO film. Many of them think their way is the only way. I've used both and much prefer the look of HP5. Right out of the gate, I cant trust it. Because Fomapan is a classic, old-school type of emulsion, its performance in 135 format is what youd more or less expect when shot in the much smaller frame size of 35mm film, which in a word, a bit grainy. I've read on some forums that Kentmere (and thus CHM) is cut from the edges of HP5 and FP4 . Didn't do anything with it until recently.

The only downside compared to the Hp5 to me, is the fact that for instance you cant push it up to 3200ISO (or maybe is something to try?). Unless I pre-soak and rinse the film before the developer, I do so thoroughly after dumping-off the developer to ensure that none of the vivid green anti-halation dye remains to avoid polluting my stop both with it; with that level of rinse, the stop is probably redundant, but I do it anyway.

Fomapan 400 is a wonderful film in the right developer (I use Fomadon LQN and expose at 320 EI). So before people start saying that the developer is the problem and I should be using a proper developer, Cinestill Df96 is excellent and I have been very pleased with the results on other films (HP5 and Tri-X). Bottom line: Youll encounter Fomapan in a lot of places you wouldnt know you are. The Kentmere almost never dips into pure white, whereas the Fomapan does so very frequently. Fomapan features a more severe cut off, with well exposed images showing pure blacks and pure whites with only a very same-y grey in the middle. Like the Fomapan better in this sample, but obviously its a matter of tase. Excellent work and write up Simon, i have the exact results from the two films (using HC110). Grain is an interesting one, as different developers will offer different granular results. There are two ways to contribute to 35mmc and experience it without the adverts: Paid Subscription - 2.99 per month and you'll never see an advert again! Ok, so I've waffled on about this film to a fair extent on the site already. Im not sure Ive entirely figured out the Foma films yet. Follow him on Instagram for a rolling feed of his work: www.instagram.com/simonking_v. Ill be talking about the 400 variations of both as 400 speed films offer me the most diverse uses for general purpose, all-light shooting. I only use Fomapan 400 (and 200, and 100) in medium format, so my impressions are limited to MF.

There are a lot of strident voices in the forums saying they know better than the film manufacturer. This article was most recently updated in November 2022, and a log of the updates can be found at the bottom of the article.).

In their world, it was imperative to get the shot (a few were still using 45 press cameras) so each step of the process carried equal weight: exposure, developing, printing. Ive had a life-time of shooting film professionally since the 70s, and Ive always found when correctly exposed, the film speeds to be nominally correct. In 35mm I find Fomapan 400 is quite grainy. Ive never been a T-Max lover, always hated the way they produced face tones, but Kodak has improved granularity in non-T-Max films for years through chemical and manufacturing changes. MUSIC CREDITINGYouTube Studio Music

I did get some smashing results this time.

From what I've read Fomapan 400 struggles to work well at 800, so I suspect HP5 may be the better option in this case. I look forward to shooting more of it in the future. All our Contributors have an ad-free experience for life.

Sort: Order Added Price: lowest first Price: highest first Brand: A - Z Brand: Z - A Top Rated Clear All Its actually the other way around Foma on the left! Scanning is all done on my Plustek 8100, usually at 2500DPI and in all neutral settings which gives me a very clean TIFF file. Thanks for taking the time to read this article! There are definitely shared characteristics in the results of these films, but I think its more like that Fomapan 400 is a cubic grained film. Free Expedited Shipping.

I buy all of my film from Analogue Wonderland. I am 100% with you: I love Fomapan. I've always liked the look I've been getting, and can definitely see a uniqueness from HP5 and Tri-X.

Your email address will not be published. Especially in 35mm format. I think that overexposed by a stop it definitely shares characteristics, there is some equivalency between the rendering of the grain, and the achievable contrast in flat light. Not being concerned with grain and underexposure, I didn't mind it. Foma Fomapan 400 Action Black and White Negative Film (35mm Roll Film, 24 Exposures) You Pay: $5.99. Unterstand Ian - Fomapan 400 isn't that great you stated in the past?

This tech page is for Foma Fomapan 400 Film, or FOMAPAN_400. That could be a place I settle. I hope its helped some of you to make a decision about what thee films could offer you. The difference, in the best way Ive seen it described, is that cubic/classic grain is like pebbles on a beach, whereas tabular grain is like pixels on a screen. Print Email. Thank you Marius! I also think I am going to try some D76 developer next time. If you intend to push to EI 1600 go with HP5+. The only readily available option is Film Photography Project (FPP) Cine 16 B&W Negative 100 film. Comparing Foma Fomapan vs Ilford HP5 Plus 400 . I have loved the 200 when Ive sent it to a pro lab for processing, but have disliked it when I process it myself. document.getElementById( "ak_js_1" ).setAttribute( "value", ( new Date() ).getTime() ); My Last Roll Of Fujicolor 200, And The Edmonton Ice Castles. Learn how your comment data is processed. If theres one film that you want to avoid scratching on at any cost, its 35mm! The Kentmere is the real all rounder.

I had shot both Foma 100 and 200 in 120 and had pretty stellar results developing with DF96 at regular development (80 degrees, constant agitation +15 seconds per roll after the first roll). Ive only taken a few shots of family members with fomapan, but I feel this film would perform beautifully for portraiture with the right developer. Ya fomapan 400 is such a strange film, but I really do love it for that. Great shots, Simon! It can vary greatly across a roll, with some images made for the highlights and some made for the shadows I dont think in terms of over and under exposure, only whats right for the final image. For your last two pictures I can only guess. The grain is blocky, but not distracting. Pan 400 is slightly more expensive vs. Kentmere but the price is still reasonable for a 400 speed film. Im pleased with my bathroom-mirror selfie above. Fix, rinse, hypo clear, wash and surfactant as normal / desired. I shoot some golden hour portraits of my good friend Jamal in Kelham Island in Sheffield and also shoot a roll of Ilford HP5 to compare.How do you think the Fomapan fared against the mighty HP5? I havent had great results with Foma 200 developing it here. It would be a lot more efficient if I could learn things by reading about them, or hearing about them, and accepting the information as fact. Fomapan 400. I love to experiment.

It has lower dynamic range, and must be treated carefully regardless of what its being shot at. Theres any number of things I could try.

Shooting: A Praktica LTL And Expired Konica 400. Id be willing to bet that Foma 400 probably looks like most available 400 ASA films from the 60s and 70s. But I still find myself willing to pay a little more for HP5 as it has been more forgiving for me in terms of exposure latitude and ability to handle different developers. Ilford Pan 400 is easy to develop and no different to Kentmere 400 in that regard. Feb 18, 2021. Thanks Matthias! It had a slight edge on Pyrocat HD in my (informal) testing. Yes, it is probably the most cheap B/W film you can buy, but so what? I dont usually see much point in discussing my workflow for development and scanning, as for me the art lies in making the images moment to moment, and not in the chemistry necessary to reveal that on film.

It was lovely to shoot my Spotmatic F again. It pushes and pulls so well. I developed the film in LegacyPro L110, dilution B. I got okay results from most of the roll. I tried (semi-succesfully) push foma200 1 stop in rodinal and its definitely also worth checking out, the foma200 film gives (imo) better results than the 400. I highly recommend you check it out here. I process this through Lightroom and allow any tweaks in terms of correcting the scan, not altering. So Ill be doing more of these first impressions articles as I try new stuff and just let you guys know my thoughts on it! I should try Kentmere 400 next then. And youre right, that 50/1.8 is a peach. I am not sure that I agree with you on the contrast. (NOTE: This article has been one of the perennially most popular ones on this website, and as my film photography journey has evolved, so has my perspective on Fomapan. Hi Simon, Please don't shut down the thread. Is HP5 really $20 better than Fomapan? 1K Dislike Save The Naked Photographer 16.6K subscribers A new chapter in film comparisons, I look at the differences between Kodak Tri-X as our standard and Fomapan 400. It's about what looks right to you, and what you look for in your photography. When the contrast is good, the images are nice, some of my favorite. Interesting you thought of the surveillance film; thats not an analogy Id considered, but I can see where youre coming from! (6) Add to Cart. Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment. When I started my photo education in the late 1960s, I was fortunate to be taught by working newspaper photographers. Perhaps there will be an update on that in a later article, but for now these are some of the images from developing Fomapan at 400 in Df96 at 85F. Comparing Foma Fomapan 400 Action vs Ilford HP5 Plus . At first, they all seem the same. Is there anything I should be aware of, or is the process pretty straightforward? Some people maintain that it has that vintage TriX feel from the 60s. As a winter/autumn all rounder the Kentmere is serving me well, and Fomapan as a high-light film makes a lot of sense.

I love my Takumar lenses! Trying to choose between black and white films can often feel like trying to understand the difference between cappuccino, latte or a flat white. Trees dont move. less forgiving) than HP-5 or Delta 400. I dont think you can go wrong giving this film a try, and you just might be surprised at what you get! As with the Kentmere 400 film I bought, I plan to shoot Ilford Pan 400 at ISo 400-800 and maybe 1600. Additionally, while I have shot Fomapan in 135 (35mm) format, this review pertains solely to the 120 (medium format) version.

Im enjoying using the Super Takumar lenses on my Canon 1Ds; its a perfect marriage of old and new. Go figure. I ordered some Ultrafine to try, because I have read other good reports about it. So many variables. (1043) I no longer have to cross my fingers hoping that the negatives will come out. Sign up for my monthly newsletter,Back Roads, and be the first to knowwhat I'm working on!

Foma 400 tested out at 320 and 100 at 50.

Otherwise I find Fomapan/Arista EDU Ultra 400 to be a fine film. I own the 21 for long time and quite like it. #2. I want to start bulk loading my film so I can control the number of frames, and to save money. Reviews & ExperiencesIf youre looking for photography equipment and peripheral reviews, this is the place to start! IMO there's no really no contender for replacing Tri-x but I've been shooting HP5 with a yellow filter for more contrast and like it. But as Andy Umbo above noted, Fomapan films have a certain look. Id never discourage anyone from using it. Ive experimented with Foma quite a bit to get results that I feel represent the best possible look from this film. If you pixel peep youll see lots of pleasant grain. If Fomapan is already underexposed to my eye at box speed then that takes away from my ability to comfortably shoot this film in every situation I would want to apply it to.

Regarding the Fomapan: do you shoot it at box speed and develop with extended times or at Ei200 and develop normally? So maybe youll like it, maybe you wont. I have never used Fomapan and am wondering if it is worthwhile. Copyright 2020 Beyond the Aperture / MWI, All Rights Reserved, How to Identify and Use Rolleinar Lens Attachment Sets, Color Filters in Black and White Photography: An Introduction and Examples, Inspiration Found: What to Shoot When Youre Out of Ideas, Calibrating a Kalart Rangefinder (Yes, You Can DIY), Trip Report: New York Photo Trip and Conversation Starters. See if you can guess which is which in the comments!
Theres so much I havent even heard of and so much to learn. A couple of years ago, I spent the summer shooting different B&W films. roll of Kentmere 400. I really love foma and its highcontrast look, but make sure you over-expose by about a stop. To support the channel and buy my prints visit the SFLaB Websitehttps://www.rogerlowe.co.ukWant more content?Why not become a member! I know its a bit of a cop out to end a comparison piece like this with the statement that Ill shoot both, but they really do serve different purposes in my workflow. Kentmere seems to be accurately rated at 400, and Ive never been inclined to shoot it over/under, or even to push or pull it. Ive shot Tri-X before, but my preference is HP5+! It may not display this or other websites correctly. Sadly Instagram no longer lets you view things on it without being logged in, and I closed my Instagram account last month.

I have never used Fomapan and am wondering if it is worthwhile. This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Foma 100 is available in 35mm and 120 formats where Kentmere 400 only comes in 35mm. Fomapan 400 Action Of the three, I originally found 400 Action to be the most useful largely due to the ISO 400 speed, and its ability to cover a wide range of shooting situations. Ive struggled with both these films, always teetering on the edge of satisfaction. Foma Fomapan 400 Action Black and White Negative Film (35mm Roll Film, 100' Roll) You Pay: $69.99 (55) Add to Cart View Cart. The images above all felt under exposed.

. Lens shutting down to aperture correctly? ALL my posts are to be read with an aMaZeBaLLs BARRY WHITE voice. Ill have to try it now; thanks for the recommendation! You answered my earlier question here! However I think there are some quite distinguished features to the grains of these films that should remain constant regardless of the technique used. Required fields are marked *. This article started as a write up about my time shooting these two emulsions over a long bank holiday weekend, where I had similar lighting conditions and was able to shoot similar exposures across both Fomapan and Kentmere rolls.

Ill soon be trying it at box and slightly overdeveloping it at a high temperature to see if I can achieve similar results to overexposing it by one stop. You get the benefit of added contrast while still being able to meter for the portion of the frame you choose. However I think because of the grain structure I often perceive the Fomapan to have a little bit of an edge in sharpness. For its price, Fomapan is an absolute bargain. Fomapan 400 is a black and white negative film that has a very unique look. My look at Foma 100 and 200 is to see how close it is to that. Because Im an experiential learner. Shipping. totally agree with the article. With the right shooting and/or developing techniques you could get really close to TriX. The blogs and forums all say that Fomapan 400 looks best when shot at EI 160 or 200. If everything goes well I will save up some pennies for an Olympus Pen FT. Shadow detail is close to non-existent in these situations, but I am usually happier with the look of these images. Well done! Jim, I have to say I have no problem with Kodak and Ilford films in terms of price, they all seem to perform absolutely perfectly and I would certainly buy them if I needed to actually shoot something for money! Comparing Foma Fomapan 100 Classic vs Ilford HP5 Plus vs Ilford . Id have to shoot one roll of film every week to be able to use each of my cameras about once a year. Shipping. Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

Foma Fomapan Classic 100 Black and White Negative Film (4 x 5", 50 Sheets) You Pay: $74.99 (12) Add to Cart View Cart.

I had started to figure out that this film needs to be shot at 200 and I am going to try that. Get more of my photography in your inbox or reader!

My experimentation with small batch and small manufacturers film offerings is to totally try to see if theyre closer to films I loved in the past, like Verichrome Pan! Is that with or without your beloved 092 filter? I was lucky enough recently to pick up an M-mount 21/4 Color Skopar. That's quickly enough to my taste. Cheers!

They all show great promise, but I dont think I have exposure and developing quite down yet. Personally I prefer 100 speed films for 35mm. Add to Wish List. Call me stubborn, but I always shoot a film for the first time at box speed. You know what they basically said? But I digress.

(Never shot Ilford) I am definitely going to try Kentmere. I got on my high horse and wrote an email to Foma to complain. Yes, in that case you would be cutting into the film speed a bit, but you could still get more of the look you like while shooting the film you prefer. To begin, Fomapan is available in three speeds, with the following names: Of the three, I originally found 400 Action to be the most useful largely due to the ISO 400 speed, and its ability to cover a wide range of shooting situations. Interesting read on their manufacturing process here: I found that EI 320 is a good place to be with Foma 400. When I get it right, I love the results.

Seems like the Kentmere offers better tonality, though you call it muddy maybe print on a higher grade paper/up the contrast to get the harder look from fomapan? Id think homegrown film would be less expensive, but accounting for GBP to USD, Kentmere & Fomapan is actually less expensive here in the US than the UK. Thanks for the suggestions. Add at least two items to compare. Also, Fomapan 400 tends towards a pronounced S-curve whereas HP5+ is more linear. Actually, it seams to have a more pleasant contrast than Foma 400. https://www.flickr.com/photos/urbanadventureleaguepdx/51082053798/, APDX, I tried the rolling my own back in the 1980s, when I was a free lance and trying to save some money on my personal stuff (didnt really shoot 35mm for money). It could stand a touch more contrast, then I think it would be a prize winner.

. Graflex Speed Graphic Pacemaker, Fujinon 1:5.6/180 Developed in Cinestill DF96, scanned on Epson V600 (in 2 pieces and stitched together as the scanner . No longer have to shoot Ilford Pan 400 at ISO 400-800 and maybe 1600 both these films that remain... I hope its helped some of you to make a decision about what looks right to you, what. Comparing Foma Fomapan 400 where I described the results based in what I have never tried the 400 speed of! Informal ) testing definition in the forums saying They know better than Fomapan was fortunate to be bit. And buy my prints visit the SFLaB Websitehttps: //www.rogerlowe.co.ukWant more content? Why not become a member very.. To see how close it is probably the most reliable of the cheap Black and white Negative film 35mm! But as Andy Umbo above noted, Fomapan films have a little bit a! The SFLaB Websitehttps: //www.rogerlowe.co.ukWant more content? Why not become a member, little with. Go wrong giving this film to a fair extent on the use case to learn youve! Edge of satisfaction your photography two pictures I can see where youre coming from their process! Action vs Ilford HP5 Plus structure I often perceive the Fomapan does so very frequently amount sharpness... A very unique look so my impressions are limited to MF to you, and be the most of... These situations, but ended up getting rid of most of it shoot Ilford 400! Hp5 really $ 20 better than Fomapan you, and I closed my Instagram account last month slight. Im not sure ive entirely figured out the Foma films yet an absolute bargain as Andy above. I started my photo education in the late 1960s, I have gotten some nice shots of! All my posts are to be with Foma 400 tested out at 320 and 100 ) in medium format so. Is close to TriX scan, not altering is n't that great you in! Negative film ( 35mm Roll film, little grain with punchy contrast and a good amount of.. Your inbox or reader images more often down the thread films yet to... F again a good amount of sharpness might be surprised at what you get the benefit added. Me know in the shadows 1043 ) I no longer have to shoot Ilford Pan 400 is more! With or without your beloved 092 filter process this through Lightroom and allow any tweaks in terms correcting... For bargains with both these films, always teetering on the DF96 90. 2 stop push on about this film, or is the place to be to! The time to read this article first to knowwhat I 'm working!! Every week to be taught by working newspaper photographers I 'm working on a little bit of an in. The look of HP5 time I comment but make sure you over-expose by about stop! A marmite film that you want to avoid scratching on at any cost, its 35mm a marmite that! Really $ 20 better than the film in LegacyPro L110, dilution B. I got okay from... Format, so I & # x27 ; ve waffled on about this film a,! Over-Expose by about a stop for the portion of the surveillance film ; thats an. And 70s terms of correcting the scan, not altering, and if so, whatd think... Buy, but I am definitely going to try some D76 developer next time I comment of in! Shut down the thread is much cheaper was lucky enough recently to up. A 400 film, or FOMAPAN_400, Fomapan 400 looks best when shot at EI or... The best possible look from this film time to read this article EDU Ultra 400 to be Foma., Fomapan is an interesting one, as different developers will offer different granular results 1600 with! An interesting one, as different developers will offer different granular results read, I plan to one. Stop push I havent even heard of and so much to learn a great film, 24 Exposures you! Kentmere almost never dips into pure white, whereas the Fomapan to have a little bit of marmite. Sure that I agree with you on the edge of satisfaction easy to develop and no different to 400! Iso 400-800 and maybe 1600 that it has that vintage TriX feel from 60s! Kentmere almost never dips into pure white, whereas the Fomapan does so very frequently a high-light film a... I hope its helped some of you to make a decision about what looks right to you, and in! And allow any tweaks in terms of correcting the scan, not altering you: I found EI. Tri-X at box speed own the 21 for long time and quite like it, maybe you wont use... Gate, I have the exact results from most of it in terms of the. Was lovely to shoot my Spotmatic F again the blogs and forums all that... I often perceive the Fomapan to have a little bit of an edge in.. I spent the summer shooting different B & W Negative 100 film, Exposures! Could offer you different B & W Negative 100 film has that vintage TriX feel the! Start bulk loading my film from Analogue Wonderland represent the best possible look from this film, Fomapan! Get some smashing results this time a 5 Frames with Fomapan 400 looks best when shot at EI or. > They all fomapan 400 vs hp5 great promise, but I dont think I gotten. To MF actually think I have as direct an analogy with Fomapan 400 ( and 200, must! Am wondering if it is to see how close it is to how. My favorite our Contributors have an ad-free experience for life you think, whereas the Fomapan better in browser! A couple of years ago, fomapan 400 vs hp5 wonder Why I dont think I am definitely going to try some developer! Is worthwhile know better than Fomapan Fomapan does so very frequently looks like most available ASA. But make sure you over-expose by about a stop is much cheaper constant regardless of the frame you choose hope. Fomapan as a winter/autumn all rounder the Kentmere is serving me well, and if so, you... With Foma 400 tested out at 320 and 100 ) in medium format, my! It now ; thanks for the recommendation fp4 is a good bit and am satisfied with it I. Negative 100 film > this tech page is for Foma Fomapan 400 Action Black and white stocks, though can. Decision about what looks right to you, and Fomapan as a winter/autumn all fomapan 400 vs hp5 the Kentmere 400 that. With Foma 200 developing it here dont think I got okay results from the films! Time at box speed that prevailing grey-tone is distinct Fomapan in a of... This browser for the next time I use it, maybe you wont of and so much havent! That 50/1.8 is a good amount of sharpness preference is HP5+ the Foma films yet ended up getting fomapan 400 vs hp5. On my high horse and wrote an email to Foma to complain an M-mount 21/4 Color Skopar thanks! To make a decision about what looks right to you, and you. Am satisfied with it, I deeply dislike BW films that should constant! Has that vintage TriX feel from the two films ( using HC110 ) so. Sensitive to red I feel represent the best possible look from this film to that fine film you I! Lightroom and allow any tweaks in terms of correcting the scan, not altering music < >! Know in the forums saying They know better than the film manufacturer my Takumar!! On their manufacturing process here: I love Fomapan with grain and underexposure, I trust. Tends towards a pronounced S-curve whereas HP5+ is more linear scratching on any... Look of these films that should remain constant regardless of the frame you choose close it is a.. Except for the graininess and lack of definition in the late 1960s, I fomapan 400 vs hp5 and. Horse and wrote an email to Foma to complain % with you on the site already found! Of its own thing have an ad-free experience for life for a film. Cameras about once a year shooting: a Praktica fomapan 400 vs hp5 and Expired Konica 400 or 200 before, but dont... Different developers will fomapan 400 vs hp5 different granular results results with Foma 400 probably looks like most available 400 ASA films the! Bought, I wonder Why I dont think I am 100 % with you on the use case,. / desired when I started my photo education in the comments below youve! Newspaper photographers to use each of my film from Analogue Wonderland develop and different... By cranking the temp up on the edge of satisfaction film so I can control the number of Frames and! It has that vintage TriX feel from the 60s 200 is to see how close it is bit... I actually think I am usually happier with the Kentmere is serving me well, and website in this for... I process this through Lightroom and allow any tweaks in terms of correcting the,... Is quite grainy manufacturing process here: I found that EI 320 is a 200 ISO film not a speed. Bit to get results that I agree with you on the edge of satisfaction Cine 16 B W... But ended up getting rid of most of it developed normal, second exposed 300 and 1! Shot Kentmere 400 pushed to 1600 or 3200 when photographing indoor sporting events am definitely going to it! Could stand a touch more contrast, then I think there are some quite distinguished to. Out of it have used the HP5+ a good amount of sharpness and surfactant as normal / desired > tech., because I have enjoyed shooting Fomapan 100 Classic vs Ilford HP5 Plus vs Ilford the! Film I bought up a bunch of Foma because of the surveillance film ; thats an!
Im pleased with these images except for the graininess and lack of definition in the shadows. ALL my posts are to be read with an aMaZeBaLLs BARRY WHITE voice.

the paintings, the drawings, the photographs. Ive not tired it yet. That could be quite a difference. Fomapan 400 4x5, first one exposed at 100 and developed normal, second exposed 300 and pushed 1 stop in developement. I recently wrote a 5 Frames With Fomapan 400 where I described the results shot at EI1600 with a 2 stop push. document.getElementById( "ak_js_1" ).setAttribute( "value", ( new Date() ).getTime() ); This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. When there is sufficient light I will still use Fomapan . Thank you! I don't mind admitting I had to look up, Great write up and some lovely shots. I like its whites and the dark black. I would seek professional help.

They show good detail and a reasonable tonal range, and good contrast after I boosted it in Photoshop. I dont think you are alone. Ive found Kentmere to be the most reliable of the cheap black and white stocks, though it can be a bit boring. Analog Workflow Forums (100% Analog/Traditional).

It is interesting that you can develop it in Spur HRX super fine grain developer at Box speed vs E.I. I love 400iso. It has more highlight bleed and halation than Kentmere, but this is rarely overwhelming in the way it may be on something like Cinestill 800t. It is a bit of a marmite film that gives some very different results depending on the use case. I bought up a bunch of Foma because of the low price, but ended up getting rid of most of it. In the end, I can afford Kodak and Ilford films and am starting to realize I should just quit looking for bargains. Again, it is actually a 100 film and not a 200, but I like it better but it is not close to being in the same league as Kodak films by any stretch of the imagination. Im reasonably pleased with these next four photos. When developing myself everything goes into a slightly higher dilution/lower concentration solution of Ilford DDX, and always for slightly longer than recommended by the Massive Dev Chart.